Warning signs of CIS fraud in your supply chain
How to identify red flags that could indicate CIS fraud in your supply chain. Covers missing UTRs, unusual …
Contractors can face 30% penalties and GPS cancellation if they 'knew or should have known' about fraud in their supply chain. This guide explains the due diligence steps you must take to protect your business, the warning signs to watch for, and how to document your checks.
Check your construction supply chain for fraud or face 30% penalties and loss of Gross Payment Status. Verify subcontractors' CIS registration, VAT details, and company information. Keep records for 6 years.
How to identify red flags that could indicate CIS fraud in your supply chain. Covers missing UTRs, unusual …
How to verify subcontractors under the Construction Industry Scheme before making payments. Covers the verification process, payment statuses, …
What to do after your CIS gross payment status is cancelled. Understand the difference between cancellation and revocation, …
How subcontractors can apply for gross payment status to receive the full value of construction payments without deductions. …
Step-by-step process for correcting Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) return errors without incurring penalties. Covers different error types, amendment …
Organised criminal groups use the Construction Industry Scheme to extract tax that is never paid to HMRC. They create false supply chains, issue fake invoices, and disappear before HMRC can collect the tax. If your business is part of a fraudulent supply chain, you could face serious consequences.
This guide explains what these rules mean for your business and the practical steps you can take to protect yourself.
Since 6 April 2026, under the Finance Act 2026 (section 220, which inserted new sections 62A to 62C and 72A to 72C into the Finance Act 2004), HMRC has strengthened powers to tackle CIS fraud. If you make or receive a payment that you knew or should have known was connected to the fraudulent evasion of tax, HMRC can:
These powers apply to both payments you make to subcontractors AND payments you receive from contractors above you in the chain.
HMRC will assess whether you knew or should have known about fraud by examining your due diligence processes. They will consider:
Due diligence is not optional. If you cannot show you took reasonable steps to check your supply chain, HMRC may conclude you "should have known" about fraud, even if you had no actual knowledge.
While all CIS contractors should implement due diligence, some situations carry higher risk:
HMRC does not prescribe exactly what checks you must carry out. Instead, your due diligence must be proportionate to the risk. Higher-risk situations require more thorough checking.
The following checks form the foundation of a robust due diligence process:
Follow this process for every new subcontractor, and repeat key checks periodically for existing relationships.
Before making any payment, confirm the subcontractor exists and is properly registered:
Fraud schemes often use "shell" companies with no real business operations:
Know who you are really dealing with:
Due diligence is not a one-time exercise. Monitor throughout the relationship:
HMRC has identified common patterns in CIS supply chain fraud. If you encounter these warning signs, investigate further before making or accepting payments.
Your records are evidence that you took reasonable steps to check your supply chain. If HMRC investigates, documented due diligence can demonstrate you did not "know or should have known" about fraud.
For each subcontractor, maintain a due diligence file containing:
Retain due diligence records for at least 6 years from the date of the last payment to that subcontractor. HMRC can investigate historical payments, so having records protects you even after the relationship ends.
Records can be paper or electronic. If electronic, ensure they are backed up and you can produce them if requested. Consider using a consistent folder structure and checklist template for each subcontractor.
Proceeding despite unresolved concerns is dangerous. If fraud is later discovered, HMRC will question why you continued to deal with the subcontractor despite warning signs.
Make due diligence part of your standard onboarding process:
Review your current supply chain against the due diligence requirements:
If multiple people in your business deal with subcontractors:
The construction industry is particularly targeted by organised fraud due to:
HMRC's CIS fraud powers are specifically designed for construction. Main contractors are increasingly requiring enhanced due diligence from their supply chain as a contractual requirement.
Use this checklist for every new subcontractor and review periodically for existing relationships:
Use the CIS online service to verify the subcontractor. Record the verification number and deduction rate. Re-verify if no payments for over 2 tax years.
If the subcontractor charges VAT, verify their VAT number using HMRC's online checker. Mismatched or invalid VAT numbers are a warning sign.
Confirm the company is active, directors match your contacts, the registered address is genuine, and filing history is up to date.
Ensure the bank account you are paying matches the registered business name. Payment requests to different accounts or third parties are a red flag.
For significant relationships, visit the business premises. Is there a genuine office or yard? Does the workforce exist as described?
Ask for details of other contractors they have worked for. Contact references to verify the relationship.
Understand who your subcontractor uses. Are there multiple layers? How is labour sourced and paid?
Maintain a due diligence file for each subcontractor. Record all checks, results, and any concerns investigated.
Review invoices for unusual patterns. Re-verify at least annually. Investigate any concerns immediately.
If you identify red flags, pause payments and investigate. Document your investigation. Seek professional advice if needed.
If HMRC suspects you were involved in a fraudulent supply chain, they will examine your due diligence processes. Having documented evidence of thorough checks is your best defence.
HMRC will consider:
If HMRC concludes you "knew or should have known" about fraud, the consequences are severe: a penalty of 30% of the lost tax, liability for the lost tax itself, and immediate GPS cancellation with a 5-year bar on reapplying.
If you are unsure whether your due diligence processes are adequate, or if you have concerns about your current supply chain: