Protecting your business from CIS supply chain fraud
Contractors can face 30% penalties and GPS cancellation if they 'knew or should have known' about fraud in …
How to identify red flags that could indicate CIS fraud in your supply chain. Covers missing UTRs, unusual payment patterns, phoenix company indicators, and labour-only invoice anomalies. Essential reading for contractors subject to fraud due diligence requirements.
Check your supply chain for signs of CIS fraud to avoid penalties. Look for missing UTRs, unusual payments, or phoenix companies. If you spot warning signs, investigate and document your findings. Ignoring red flags could make you liable for unpaid tax.
Contractors can face 30% penalties and GPS cancellation if they 'knew or should have known' about fraud in …
How to verify subcontractors under the Construction Industry Scheme before making payments. Covers the verification process, payment statuses, …
What to do after your CIS gross payment status is cancelled. Understand the difference between cancellation and revocation, …
How subcontractors can apply for gross payment status to receive the full value of construction payments without deductions. …
Step-by-step process for correcting Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) return errors without incurring penalties. Covers different error types, amendment …
HMRC can hold you liable for fraud in your supply chain if you knew or should have known about it. This means you could face penalties and unpaid tax recovery even if you were not directly involved in the fraud.
Recognising warning signs is your first line of defence. If you identify red flags and investigate appropriately, you demonstrate that you could not reasonably have known about any fraud. If you ignore warning signs, HMRC may determine you "should have known" and hold you responsible.
This guide explains what to look for and what to do when you spot potential problems.
Since 6 April 2026, under the Finance Act 2026 (section 220, amending the Finance Act 2004), the consequences of failing to spot fraud in your supply chain are severe:
Organised criminal groups use construction supply chains to extract tax that is never paid to HMRC. Even legitimate contractors at the top of a chain can be held responsible for what happens further down.
The following snippet summarises the key warning signs HMRC has identified. Each of these should prompt further investigation before you make or receive payments.
Understanding how these red flags appear in real situations helps you spot them in your own supply chain.
Scenario: A new labour-only subcontractor offers competitive rates for groundwork on your housing development. They provide a UTR that verifies successfully, but when you search Companies House, the company was only formed 3 months ago. The registered address is a residential property. After 6 months of work, the company stops responding and you discover they have been dissolved with unpaid tax.
Warning signs you should have spotted:
What you should have done: Visited the business premises, verified the workforce existed, checked director history for previous dissolved companies, and questioned the below-market pricing.
Scenario: You pay a tier-1 subcontractor who subcontracts to a tier-2, who subcontracts to a tier-3. Each company is registered for CIS and verifies correctly. However, the tier-3 company never pays the CIS deductions to HMRC. HMRC investigates and finds the three companies share directors or connected persons, and money flowed back to the original payer.
Warning signs you should have spotted:
What you should have done: Mapped your complete supply chain, asked direct questions about who employs the workers, and investigated when company names changed.
Scenario: A bricklaying subcontractor you have used for years suddenly changes company name. The directors are the same, the workers are the same, but invoices now come from "ABC Brickwork Ltd" instead of "XYZ Brickwork Ltd". When you check Companies House, XYZ Brickwork Ltd was dissolved with outstanding tax liabilities.
Warning signs you should have spotted:
What you should have done: Checked director history before continuing the relationship, asked why the company changed, and verified the new company's compliance status.
When you spot a red flag, you must investigate before making payment. Simply noting the concern is not enough - you need to take action and document what you did.
Do not pay until your concerns are resolved. Once money leaves your account, recovering it from a fraudulent supplier is extremely difficult. Genuine subcontractors will understand reasonable payment delays for verification.
Contact the subcontractor and ask specific questions about the concern:
Evasive or inconsistent answers are themselves a warning sign.
Do not rely solely on information the subcontractor provides:
Keep a written record of:
If HMRC later investigates, this documentation demonstrates you took the "knew or should have known" test seriously.
Based on your investigation, decide whether to:
You can report suspected CIS fraud to HMRC anonymously. Reporting protects you by demonstrating you took action when you identified concerns.
Consider reporting if:
HMRC will not tell you the outcome of any investigation, but reporting demonstrates you acted responsibly.
Rather than treating fraud detection as a one-off exercise, build it into your standard onboarding and payment processes:
If HMRC determines you "should have known" about fraud in your supply chain, the consequences are severe:
| Consequence | Impact |
|---|---|
| 30% penalty on lost tax | Chargeable to your business, plus directors and connected persons personally |
| Liability for the lost tax | You can be made liable for the tax lost on transactions you knew or should have known were connected to fraud |
| GPS cancellation | Immediate cancellation with a 5-year bar before you can reapply |
| HMRC investigation | Time-consuming review of all your CIS records and relationships |
| Reputational damage | Other contractors may avoid working with you |
Ignorance is not a defence. If warning signs were present and you did not investigate, HMRC will argue you should have known.
To protect your business from supply chain fraud liability: