Environmental compliance for construction sites
Your environmental obligations for construction sites including site waste management, environmental permits, dust control, and noise management.
How to meet your legal duties under the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992. Covers risk assessment, the TILE framework, and reducing injury risks for employers in all sectors.
You must protect your workers from injuries caused by lifting or carrying heavy loads. First try to avoid manual handling. If you can't avoid it, assess the risks using the TILE method and take steps to reduce them. Train workers but also provide equipment like trolleys or adjust workstations to make tasks safer.
Your environmental obligations for construction sites including site waste management, environmental permits, dust control, and noise management.
Essential health and safety requirements for construction sites including work at height, asbestos, manual handling, and PPE.
Making glass, ceramics, cement, lime, concrete and stone products is machinery- and dust-intensive, and respirable crystalline silica is …
Producing basic metals — smelting, casting, rolling, refining and founding iron, steel, aluminium and other non-ferrous metals — …
Every coal or lignite mining operation must meet universal workplace duties before it tackles the sector-specific mining safety, …
Manual handling injuries are one of the most common causes of workplace absence in the UK. If your employees lift, carry, push, pull, or move loads by hand, you have legal duties under the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992.
These regulations apply to all employers regardless of sector. Getting manual handling right protects your workers from painful and debilitating injuries - and protects your business from enforcement action, compensation claims, and lost productivity.
The law requires you to follow a strict hierarchy when managing manual handling risks. You cannot simply provide training and expect workers to lift safely - you must first consider whether the manual handling is necessary at all.
If you cannot avoid hazardous manual handling, you must conduct a suitable and sufficient risk assessment. Use the TILE framework to systematically evaluate the risks:
Walk through your workplace and list every task involving lifting, carrying, pushing, pulling, or moving loads. Include less obvious tasks like repositioning boxes on shelves or moving equipment.
Focus first on tasks with heavy loads, awkward postures, high frequency, or previous injury history. You do not need to assess every single lift - focus on representative tasks and highest risks.
For each significant task, systematically assess Task, Individual, Load, and Environment factors. Use the HSE's MAC (Manual Handling Assessment Charts) tool for a structured approach.
For each risk identified, determine what controls can reduce it. Consider mechanical aids, team lifting, job rotation, workstation redesign, and training.
Put controls in place and check they are working. Review assessments when tasks change, after incidents, or at least annually.
Many employers mistakenly believe there are legal weight limits for manual handling. There are not - the law requires risk assessment, not arbitrary limits. However, HSE provides guideline figures as a starting point:
These guideline figures assume ideal conditions: good grip, load held close to the body at elbow height, with adequate space and firm footing. If conditions are not ideal - and they rarely are - the safe weight reduces significantly.
Never use these figures as absolute limits. A 15kg load could be dangerous if lifted repeatedly from floor level with poor grip, while a 30kg load might be acceptable as a rare team lift with mechanical aids available.
Common control measures include:
Important: Training alone is not sufficient. You must implement physical controls before relying on safe handling techniques.
Workers say they are fine and do not need help: Your duty exists regardless of worker preferences. Some workers take pride in lifting heavy loads - but this does not remove your legal obligation to reduce risks.
Cannot afford mechanical aids: Consider cheaper alternatives like trolleys, or reorganising work to reduce handling. The cost of aids is almost always less than the cost of injury claims and absence.
Staff have existing back problems: Consider individual capability in your assessment. You may need to adjust duties or provide additional aids for workers with health conditions.
Delivery drivers and mobile workers: The regulations apply equally. Provide training, appropriate equipment, and consider vehicle loading height when selecting vehicles.