Avoid wrongful trading as a company director
How directors can avoid personal liability for wrongful trading under section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Covers …
Comprehensive guide to insolvency procedures for UK limited companies facing financial distress. Covers rescue options (CVA, administration), solvent closure (MVL), and insolvent liquidation (CVL, compulsory winding up). Includes directors' duties, personal liability risks, and when to seek professional advice.
If your company is struggling financially, act early to explore rescue or closure options. You must seek professional advice to avoid personal liability. Choices include paying debts over time (CVA), handing control to an insolvency practitioner (administration), or closing the company (liquidation).
How directors can avoid personal liability for wrongful trading under section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Covers …
How to verify a person is eligible to be a company director before you appoint them. Covers the …
How company directors can be disqualified under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, the grounds for disqualification (sections …
The order in which creditors are paid when a company goes into liquidation or administration. Covers fixed and …
The seven general duties every company director must follow under the Companies Act 2006, with guidance on stakeholder …
When a limited company faces financial difficulty, directors have several formal insolvency procedures available. The right option depends on whether the company is solvent, whether rescue is possible, and creditor consent.
This guide explains the main insolvency procedures under the Insolvency Act 1986, from rescue mechanisms to liquidation routes. It covers costs, timelines, and critical duties directors must fulfil to avoid personal liability.
Act early: The earlier you seek professional advice, the more options are available. Waiting until a crisis point limits your choices and increases personal risk.
A CVA is a formal agreement with creditors to pay debts over time (typically 1-5 years) while the company continues trading. It's a debtor-in-possession process - directors remain in control, unlike administration where an insolvency practitioner takes over.
When to use CVA: Company has viable business but cash flow problems, directors believe they can return to profitability, creditors willing to accept reduced or delayed payment, company needs breathing space without immediate liquidation.
Who can use CVA: Limited companies and Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs). Not available to sole traders (must use Individual Voluntary Arrangement) or companies already in liquidation.
Key advantages of CVA:
Key disadvantages of CVA:
Administration is a formal insolvency procedure where a licensed insolvency practitioner (administrator) takes control of the company to achieve rescue or better outcomes for creditors than immediate liquidation. The key benefit is the statutory moratorium - creditors cannot take enforcement action without administrator consent.
When to use administration: Company needs protection from creditor action (winding-up petition imminent, bailiffs threatening to seize assets), rescue possible with breathing space and restructuring, better outcome achievable than immediate liquidation, time needed to sell business as going concern.
Key advantages of administration:
Key disadvantages of administration:
A "pre-pack" is where the sale of the company's business is negotiated before administration begins, and completed immediately after the administrator is appointed. Pre-packs are controversial when the sale is to directors or connected parties ("phoenix" situations), but can maximise value by preserving the business as a going concern.
If you are a director planning to buy the business back through a pre-pack administration, you are strongly advised to refer the proposed sale to the Pre-Pack Pool for independent evaluation before administration commences.
Who this applies to: Directors, shadow directors, or their family members/business partners who are proposed purchasers in a pre-packaged administration sale (within first 8 weeks of administration).
Failure to obtain independent validation significantly increases the risk of:
The Pre-Pack Pool provides an independent opinion on whether the sale represents fair value and the best outcome for creditors, enhancing credibility and reducing challenge risk.
Source: Administration (Restrictions on Disposal etc. to Connected Persons) Regulations 2021; Statement of Insolvency Practice 16
MVL is used when the company is solvent (can pay all debts in full within 12 months) but directors wish to close the business. Common scenarios include retirement, completion of a project, or extracting retained profits in a tax-efficient manner.
When to use MVL: Company is solvent with surplus assets after paying creditors, directors retiring or ceasing trade, shareholders want to extract profits (potentially qualifying for Business Asset Disposal Relief, formerly Entrepreneurs' Relief), company completed its purpose (e.g. single project SPV).
Critical requirement: Directors must make a statutory Declaration of Solvency swearing the company can pay all debts in full within 12 months. False declarations are a criminal offence.
Tax efficiency of MVL: Distributions in MVL are typically treated as capital (subject to Capital Gains Tax) rather than income. Business Asset Disposal Relief may reduce CGT to 10% on qualifying gains, though strict conditions apply and anti-avoidance rules (Transactions in Securities provisions) can challenge this treatment. Always take professional tax advice.
If insolvency discovered during MVL: If the liquidator discovers the company is insolvent (cannot pay debts in full), the MVL automatically converts to a Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation. The liquidator must call a creditors' meeting and creditors can appoint a different liquidator. Directors who made a false Declaration of Solvency face criminal penalties.
CVL is used when directors recognise the company is insolvent and cannot continue trading. It is a proactive, voluntary approach to winding up, preferable to waiting for compulsory liquidation by creditors.
When to use CVL: Company cannot pay debts as they fall due or liabilities exceed assets, no realistic prospect of rescue or return to profitability, directors acting responsibly before creditors petition for compulsory winding up, preferable to administration if no rescue possible (CVL cheaper and gives directors more control over process).
Key advantages of CVL over compulsory liquidation:
Liquidator investigation: The liquidator will investigate the company's affairs and directors' conduct for the last 3 years of trading. This includes reviewing transactions, asset disposals, preferential payments, and whether directors continued trading when insolvency was inevitable. Reports are submitted to the Insolvency Service, which may result in director disqualification proceedings.
Compulsory liquidation occurs when a creditor (or other eligible party) petitions the court to wind up the company. It is the most damaging form of insolvency - expensive, public, and strips directors of all powers immediately.
When compulsory liquidation happens: Creditor owed £750+ serves statutory demand and company fails to pay within 21 days, creditor petitions court for winding-up order, HMRC petitions for unpaid tax debts, shareholder petitions on "just and equitable" grounds, company fails to respond to CVL or administration options.
How to defend a winding-up petition:
Consequences of failing to defend: Court makes winding-up order, Official Receiver appointed immediately, all bank accounts frozen, directors lose all powers, employees dismissed, company name published in London Gazette, significant damage to director reputation and credit records.
The most critical legal issue for directors is understanding when duties shift from promoting shareholder interests to protecting creditors. Once a company is insolvent, directors' primary duty is to creditors, not shareholders.
Why this matters: Breach of duty to creditors can result in personal liability, director disqualification for 2-15 years, and in serious cases, criminal prosecution.
Directors must understand the two legal tests for insolvency under Insolvency Act 1986 s.123. Once either test is met, directors' duties fundamentally change and personal liability risks arise.
Cash flow test (s.123(1)(e)): Company unable to pay debts as they fall due. Evidenced by:
Balance sheet test (s.123(2)): Liabilities exceed assets, taking into account contingent and prospective liabilities. Evidenced by:
If either test is met, directors must immediately take steps to minimise loss to creditors or face wrongful trading claims.
Source: Insolvency Act 1986 s.123; West Mercia Safetywear Ltd v Dodd [1988]
Wrongful trading is the most common basis for liquidators to pursue directors for personal contributions to the company's assets. It is a civil (not criminal) offence, but can result in substantial personal liability.
The risk: If directors continued trading when they knew or should have known there was no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvent liquidation, they can be made personally liable for the increase in creditor losses from that point onwards.
The only defence to wrongful trading is proving you took every step with a view to minimising the potential loss to creditors from the moment you knew or should have known insolvency was inevitable.
Practical steps to establish the defence:
What does NOT constitute every step:
Court awards: Wrongful trading awards typically range from £10,000 to £500,000+ depending on the increase in creditor losses attributable to continued trading. Awards are paid to the liquidator for distribution to creditors.
Source: Insolvency Act 1986 s.214; Brooks v Armstrong [2015] EWHC 2289 (Ch); Ralls Builders Ltd (in liquidation) [2016] EWHC 1812 (Ch)
All formal insolvency procedures (CVA, administration, MVL, CVL) require appointment of a licensed insolvency practitioner. Understanding fee structures and choosing the right IP is critical to maximising creditor returns and minimising costs.
Choosing an insolvency practitioner:
Red flags: IP who guarantees specific outcomes (e.g. "you won't face disqualification"), extremely low fees (may indicate lack of experience or intention to inflate expenses), IP who is family member or business associate (conflict of interest), IP who suggests improper conduct (asset stripping, preference payments, phoenix arrangements without proper process).
The single most important action directors can take when facing financial difficulty is to seek professional advice early. The earlier you act, the more options are available and the lower the risk of personal liability.
Seek advice immediately if:
Professional advisors:
Free government resources: Business Debtline (0800 197 6026) provides free, confidential debt advice for businesses. Covers options, creditor negotiation, insolvency procedures.
Each insolvency procedure serves different purposes. This comparison helps directors and advisors choose the most appropriate route.
| Procedure | When to use | Solvency status | Control | Typical cost | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVA | Rescue possible, creditors willing to compromise | Usually insolvent | Directors remain in control | £2,500-£5,000 setup + 10-15% ongoing | 1-5 years | Debts paid over time, company continues |
| Administration | Rescue possible with moratorium, or orderly sale needed | Insolvent | Administrator in control | £20,000-£100,000+ | 1 year (extendable) | Rescue, CVA, sale, or liquidation |
| MVL | Solvent closure, tax-efficient extraction | Solvent | Liquidator appointed | £2,000-£15,000 | 3-12 months | Debts paid in full, surplus to shareholders |
| CVL | Insolvent, no rescue possible, proactive closure | Insolvent | Liquidator appointed | £4,000-£25,000 | 6-18 months | Assets realised, creditors paid pro-rata |
| Compulsory liquidation | Creditor petition, directors failed to act | Insolvent | Official Receiver appointed | £4,500-£7,000+ (for petitioner) | 6-24 months | Assets realised, creditors paid pro-rata |